A Cleaned Up Disclaimer For My Page
- Documenting Ableism In America
- Mar 8
- 2 min read
Individuals who believe content on this page is factually inaccurate may request correction through respectful, evidence based communication.
Speech addressing discrimination and civil rights issues is strongly protected under the First Amendment (U.S. Const. amend. I; New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254; Snyder v. Phelps, 562 U.S. 443).
Documenting Ableism — Legal Disclaimer (Pennsylvania Specific)
Documenting Ableism is an advocacy, education, and documentation page dedicated to identifying, recording, and challenging ableism, disability based harassment, and discrimination experienced by disabled individuals in both public spaces and online environments.
Disabled people have the right to speak about discrimination, harassment, and mistreatment they experience, including identifying conduct and individuals involved when statements are truthful or clearly expressed as opinion.
Speech addressing civil rights issues and discrimination is strongly protected under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution (U.S. Const. amend. I). Courts have consistently recognized that discussion of social injustice and matters of public concern lies at the core of constitutional free speech protections.
Under Pennsylvania law, truth is an absolute defense to defamation. To establish defamation under Pennsylvania law, a plaintiff must prove the elements outlined in 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 8343, including that a statement of fact was false and caused reputational harm.
Pennsylvania courts also distinguish protected opinion from actionable defamation. Expressions of opinion, interpretation, or personal experience, particularly when supported by disclosed facts, are protected speech and are not defamatory (Baker v. Lafayette College, 532 A.2d 399 (Pa. 1987)).
Content shared on this page reflects lived experiences, documented interactions, and information drawn from publicly available sources. Material is shared in good faith for purposes of documentation, commentary, advocacy, and education.
This page does not engage in harassment, threats, retaliation, or doxxing. No private home addresses, phone numbers, or non public personal identifying information are published. Names or images appear only when they originate from public sources and are relevant to documenting conduct.
Use of publicly available material for commentary, reporting, and advocacy may also fall under federal fair use protections (17 U.S.C. § 107).
Documenting discrimination and naming harmful conduct is not harassment. Advocacy for accountability, particularly by members of historically marginalized groups, is a recognized form of civic participation and protected expression.
Individuals who believe content on this page is factually inaccurate may request correction through respectful, evidence based communication.
⸻
Works Cited (MLA)
Baker v. Lafayette College. 532 A.2d 399. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1987.
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. 376 U.S. 254. Supreme Court of the United States, 1964.
Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes. Title 42, § 8343.
United States Constitution. Amendment I.
United States Code. Title 17, § 107.
Snyder v. Phelps. 562 U.S. 443. Supreme Court of the United States, 2011.
Comments